Legal Opinion
Kurtin v. National RR Passenger Corp.(Amtrak)
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 6, 1995No. 93 Civ. 6863 (PKL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is an action brought by Dido Kurtin (“Kurtin”) against the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”), seeking recovery for injuries allegedly sustained as the result of a fall from the Hell’s Gate Bridge (the “Bridge”). Amtrak brought a third-party action against George Campbell Painting Corporation (“Campbell” or “plaintiff’), Kurtin’s employer, seeking common law and contractual indemnification. Campbell, in turn, brought a fourth-party action against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 1 (“Liberty” or “defendant”), its insurance carrier.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Hunt Ltd. v. Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Turner Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Providence Washington InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Yonkers Contracting Co. v. General Star National InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Rowe v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022