Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Providence Washington Insurance
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 6, 1997No. 95-CV-0593 (FJS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
SCULLIN, District Judge.
This is a diversity action for indemnification in which Plaintiff Royal Indemnity Company (“Plaintiff’) alleges that Defendant Providence Washington Insurance Company (“Defendant”) faded to defend and indemnify Plaintiff for claims arising out of an automobile collision occurring on March 15, 1990. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and monetary relief. Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
BACKGROUND
The underlying facts in this case are not in dispute. On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Morris v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Randazzo v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- R.E. Turner, Inc. v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
- Randazzo v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. 21st Century Transport Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Moore v. NayerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Providence Washington InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Am. Trucking & Transp. Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018