Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Litteer
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided June 26, 1996No. Civil No. 94-78-SDPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the court are plaintiffs motion to reconsider and plaintiffs motion for certification of question' of law. All defendants object to both motions.
1. Motion to Reconsider, document 93
By medium of motion filed on the tenth day post entry of final judgment, plaintiff presumably invokes Rule 59, Fed.R.Civ.P., and asks the court to reconsider its decision to dismiss his claims as barred by the expiration of the statute of limitations.
*692Plaintiff’s timely motion to reconsider, see Rule 59(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., vests this court with the jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. World University Inc., Santa Barbara Center CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Frederick Feinstein v. Morris and Joyce Moses, D/B/A Sun-Cal ProductsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Jorge Rivera Surillo & Co. v. Falconer Glass Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Shillady v. Elliot Community HospitalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Conrad v. HazenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.