Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. Williamson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1926No. 16753PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The ruling set forth in the syllabus may not be altogether, free from doubt and difficulty. We do not think that a dependent can recover under the workmen’s compensation act except by virtue of rights and remedies therein provided. Section 12 of the act provides that “the rights and remedies herein granted to an employee where he and his employer have accepted the provisions of this act respectively to pay and accept compensation on account of personal injury or death by accident shall exclude all other rights and rem*218edies of such employee, his personal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Evans v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. Van Treeck v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. Marshall v. Macon Sash, Door & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. FreelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. DunbarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. MacOn, Dublin & Savannah Railroad Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Sanders v. RayIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Atkinson v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API