Legal Opinion

Jeroski v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 11, 2012No. 11-3687PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

We are asked to reverse an administrative denial of an application for an award of attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504. The Act provides, so far as bears on this case, that “a prevailing party” shall be awarded “fees and other expenses” incurred by it in an “adversary adjudication” before a federal agency unless “the position of the agency was substantially justified.” § 504(a)(1). The parallel provision applicable to a judicial (as distinct from an administrative) adjudication, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a)(1), is not involved.

The petitioner, USA…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Sullivan v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Curtis Bartlett v. John A. Heibl and John A. Heibl, Attorney at LawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Thomas v. National Science FoundationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. Aronov v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cactus Canyon Quarries, Inc. v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. Product Source International, LLC v. NahshinDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  3. In re: Linda StampsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Rodriguez v. ATF UC 3749District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
  5. Roundtree v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API