Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Rollins
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 9, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2025-1625Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL BISHOP, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 25-cv-01625 (TNM) BROOKE ROLLINS Secretary of Agriculture, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER For the fourth time, Paul Bishop sues the Secretary of Agriculture under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. See Compl. at 1, ECF No. 1. He maintains that the Department of Agriculture passed him over for a position because of his race and sex. The Secretary moves to dismiss, arguing that the same defects that doomed Bishop’s prior complaints exist here. Mot. to Dismiss at 1, ECF No. 15. The Court denies…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.