Legal Opinion

State v. Laturner

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 27, 2007No. 96,086PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAnany, J.:

Michael Edward Latumer challenges his convictions for possession of methamphetamine and drag paraphernalia. He claims the trial court’s reliance upon K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 22-3437 to admit the incriminating results of lab tests performed on substances found in his possession denied him the right under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution to confront his accuser. Because of the testimonial nature of the lab report and the trial court’s discretion under K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 22-3437(3) to admit it into evidence over the defendant’s objection and without the testimony of the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. HarcrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  2. State v. LaturnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Magruder v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  4. Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Wimbish v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API