Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kasper

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 30, 1994No. 70,995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Margaret Mahoney appeals from an order admitting an executed copy of the will of Mary Kasper, deceased, to probate. Mahoney contends the trial court erred by concluding there was substantial competent evidence to rebut the common-law presumption that the will had been revoked. In addition, she argues the trial court erred by admitting into evidence prior statements made by the decedent.

On April 25, 1991, Mary Kasper executed a will drafted by her attorney, Kenneth Cole. When Mary left Mr. Cole’s office, she was carrying both the original and a copy of her will. Louis Kasper,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. McKissick v. FryeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Thompson v. NormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Estates of Thompson v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. State v. RatleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. EGGESON v. DeLUCACourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  2. In re Estate of BooneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API