Legal Opinion

Nam Sing Shak v. Doi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1966No. 4585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, having appealed to the circuit court in Criminal No. 36238 for a trial de novo before a jury, moved for dismissal of the charge on the ground of lack of jurisdiction “because of the absence of a formal accusation against the defendant in the form of a written complaint.” The motion to dismiss having been denied, petitioner obtained a temporary writ of prohibition from a justice of this court, asserting in his petition that “the court lacked jurisdiction because a formal accusation against the petitioner in the form of a written complaint had never been filed in the case,” and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. State v. GoetzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Cuckovich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  4. Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. Sing KeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CabagbagHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. ItoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. CabagbagHawaii Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API