Bill Minielli Cement Contracting, Inc. v. Richter Concrete Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTER, District Judge:
This is a private antitrust case in which plaintiffs charge defendants conspired to fix prices of ready-mix concrete and also discriminated in such prices. Plaintiffs requested that the case be designated as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 Fed.R.Civ.P.
The defendants strongly oppose this motion. They do so on, the ground that there is no proof the class is too numerous to make joinder impracticable, common questions of law and fact do not predominate, and plaintiffs are not suitable representatives of the class anyhow.
*383The question about predominance of common…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Demarco v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Freedman v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- In re Plywood Anti-trust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
- In re Anthracite Coal Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Folding Cartons, Inc. v. American Can Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1978
- Lefrak v. Arabian American Oil Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.