Legal Opinion

Schwertfeger v. Moorehouse

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 27, 1990No. 89-32PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Edgar A. Schwertfeger, Jr., appeals from a judgment based on a jury verdict awarding John David Moorehouse and Julie Marie Moorehouse, d/b/a Seymour Company, damages for the conversion of two vending machines. The jury returned a verdict of $750 in compensatory damages and $25,000 in punitive damages. On appeal, Schwertfeger raises issues regarding the sufficiency of the evidence, the jury charges, certain evidentiary matters, and an alleged excessiveness of the punitive damages award. We affirm.

I. Facts

Because of the recent spread of the AIDS virus, John David Moorehouse, a physician,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. DaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., Inc. v. SealySupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Roberson v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Rainsville Bank v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Bains v. JamesonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. K.S. v. CarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES v. Jacobs BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Schaeffer v. PoellnitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
  4. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. CaddellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Empire Gas, Inc. of Belle Mina v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API