Legal Opinion
Schlumberger Ltd. v. Douglas Furniture of California, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 31, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 66-916-AAHPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAUK, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Schlumberger Limited, by its Complaint, charges the Defendant, Douglas Furniture of California, Inc., with infringement of its Peterson Patent No. 3,240,460. In defense, Defendant alleges that the patent has not been infringed and that it is invalid on various grounds. Defendant also counterclaims for unfair competition and seeks a declaration that the patent is invalid and not infringed.
The patent in suit relates to metal furniture, such as is commonly found in homes and apartments. It is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Brooks Walker v. General Motors Corporation and Les Vogel Chevrolet CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. Kollsman Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Charlie Cox v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co., a Corporation and Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1974