Legal Opinion
Rosier v. Brown
Rochester City Court
Decided August 2, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Melchor E. Castro, J.
This nonpayment summary proceeding was commenced by the petitioner following termination of the respondent’s Section 8 housing assistance payment subsidy, which was triggered by the petitioner’s refusal to comply with the Section 8 quality housing standards.
42 USC § 1437f, part of the Low-Rent Housing Act (42 USC § 1437 et seq.), provides for assistance to lower income families in obtaining decent housing and generally promotes the creation of economically mixed housing. These subsidies are administered through a public housing agency, which certifies…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- McNeill v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Nepco Forged Products, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Goodman-Marks Associates Inc. v. Westbury Post AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- MATTER OF AM. TRANSIT INS. CO. v. CorcoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998