Legal Opinion
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Home Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1998No. Nos. 97-3325, 97-3405PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) sued Home Insurance Company (“Home”), INA Corporation, Insurance Company of North America (“INA”), CIGNA Corporation, and CIGNA International Corporation.1 In its complaint, Nationwide alleged that Home and the CIGNA defendants had breached reinsurance contracts under which they were responsible for paying certain claims filed against Nationwide. Nationwide sought declaratory relief as well as compensatory and punitive damages. The district court stayed Nationwide’s claims against Home pending arbitration. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Officer Melissa Kallstrom v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Jordan Haber, Debbie Haber v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Nepco Forged Products, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Nicholson v. 300 Broadway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Home InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998