Legal Opinion

People v. Pace

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 2015No. Docket 322808PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this interlocutory appeal, the prosecution appeals by leave granted an order entered by the Washtenaw Circuit Court denying plaintiff s application for leave to appeal a district court order which granted defendant’s motion for a specific jury instruction. We reverse and remand.

The basic facts of this case are not in dispute. On June 5, 2013, as Michael John Bly used a pedestrian crosswalk to walk across Church Street in Ann Arbor, defendant made a left-hand turn onto Church Street and struck Bly with his vehicle. As a result of the collision, Bly suffered head trauma that left him…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. People v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  4. People v. RobyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. People v. SchaeferMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People of Michigan v. Edward Michael CzuprynskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Home-Owners Insurance v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
  3. Dustin Rowland v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Katrina White v. Domenico PaceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. People of Michigan v. Edward Michael CzuprynskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API