Legal Opinion
Opinion No. (1991)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided June 10, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Director White,
¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your letter asking for an official opinion addressing, in effect, the following questions:
1. Does 74 O.S. 500.51 (1991) prohibit the payment ofmoving expenses of employees newly hired by the State ofOklahoma? and 2. Does 74 O.S. 500.51 (1991) apply to institutions ofhigher education in the State of Oklahoma?
I
NEW EMPLOYEES
¶ 1 Your threshold question is whether employees newly hired by the State of Oklahoma may be paid for the cost of moving expenses pursuant to 74 O.S. 500.51 (1991) which states:
It is the purpose of this act to provide…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oliver v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Allen v. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices & JudgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- City of Tulsa v. SmittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- TWA v. McKinleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.