Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Manor

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1897No. 17,835PublishedCited by 42 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellants, heirs of James L. Bartlett, instituted this proceeding in the circuit court against the appellees, heirs of Mary A. Watt.

The amended complaint alleged that in the year 1855 said James L. Bartlett, by the provisions of his will then executed, devised the lands in controversy in fee-simple to his wife, Mary A. Bartlett, who, after his death, married one Watt; that in the year 1861 said James executed another will, in which he devised to1 said Mary an estate in said lands for life and revoked the will of 1855; that said Mary was given the custody of said two wills, which she held…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Storms v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Taylor v. Cranberry Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Luther v. LutherIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Evansville Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. WinsorIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Donnella, Admrx. v. CradyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. Wever v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Pollen v. Ford Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API