United States v. Ninety-Two Thousand Four Hundred Twenty-Two Dollars & Fifty-Seven Cents
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALITO, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of civil forfeiture for funds from a bank account owned by Kim’s Wholesale Distributors, Inc. (“Kim’s”). The complaint claimed that the funds were subject to forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) on the ground that they had been involved in transactions in violation of the money laundering statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Proof supporting the forfeiture was obtained from business records seized from *142Kim’s pursuant to a warrant issued by a United States Magistrate Judge in connection with a wide-scale investigation of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Elie F. Abboud (04-3942) and Michel Abboud (04-3943)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Doe v. GroodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. TraceyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Lei ShiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Buckham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.