City Affairs Committee v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hehek, J.
We hold the view that a municipality may lawfully publicize, at public expense, what its governing body conceives to be sound reasons, relating to the essential local welfare, for the rejection by the people of the state of proposed amendments to the constitution.
The power to take reasonable measures to conserve their own vital interests is incident to the general powers of local government conferred upon the municipalities. The right of advocacy and defense of the communal welfare in the state legislative forum has long been accorded general…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell v. KirklandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Gutta Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. Village of OgalallaNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Denison v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Farrel v. Town of DerbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- State ex rel. Morris v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Higgins v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Houman v. Mayor & Coun. Bor. Pompton LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- City of Glendale v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Anderson v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Riddlestorffer v. City of RahwayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.