Legal Opinion

Sinnott v. Finnerty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 16, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondents dated October 17, 1983 which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of misconduct, imposed a punishment of an official reprimand, and failed to remit petitioner’s prehearing 30-day suspension without pay. By judgment dated November 19, 1984 (Matter of Sinnott v Finnerty, 105 AD2d 790), this court dismissed the proceeding, holding that a determination resulting in a mere reprimand is not reviewable, and that the failure to remit petitioner’s prehearing suspension without pay did not constitute a post-hearing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Brabham v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Sinnott v. FinnertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matteson v. City of OswegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API