United States v. Hoxsey Cancer Clinic
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
Proceeding under the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 1 and relying particularly upon its provisions defining labeling, 2 prohibiting introduction into interstate commerce of any drug that is misbranded, 3 and deeming a drug misbranded “If its labeling is false or mislead ing in any particular”, 4 the United States sought in the trial Court the injunctive relief provided by the Act 5 to prevent the Hoxsey Cancer Clinic, and Harry M. Hox-sey, from introducing or delivering for introduction into interstate commerce bottles of brownish-black, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Sanders v. LeechCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. UrbuteitSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Jerome Strauss and Adam StraussCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Morphew v. MorphewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Burzynski Cancer Research InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States of America, Libelant-Appellee v. An Article of Device . . . Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Articles of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.