Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoxsey Cancer Clinic

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1952No. 13645_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.

Proceeding under the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 1 and relying particularly upon its provisions defining labeling, 2 prohibiting introduction into interstate commerce of any drug that is misbranded, 3 and deeming a drug misbranded “If its labeling is false or mislead ing in any particular”, 4 the United States sought in the trial Court the injunctive relief provided by the Act 5 to prevent the Hoxsey Cancer Clinic, and Harry M. Hox-sey, from introducing or delivering for introduction into interstate commerce bottles of brownish-black, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Kordel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Sanders v. LeechCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  4. United States v. UrbuteitSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. Jerome Strauss and Adam StraussCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Morphew v. MorphewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. Burzynski Cancer Research InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States of America, Libelant-Appellee v. An Article of Device . . . Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. United States v. Articles of DrugCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API