Legal Opinion
Srubar v. Rudd, Rosenberg, Mitofsky & Hollender
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 9, 1994No. 92 Civ. 8140 (KMW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge.
Defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that plaintiff has failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985, 42 U.S.C. § 1983-, the Fourth Amendment, and the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Defendants also seek an order prohibiting plaintiff from filing any additional actions against defendants that are based on the allegations contained in the instant complaint. On December 9, 1994, Magistrate Judge Ellis issued a Report and Recommendation (the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morpurgo v. Incorporated Village of Sag HarborDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Estes-El v. Town of Indian LakeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- McCarthy v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Beattie v. Farnsworth Middle SchoolDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- Gambino v. RubenfeldDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.