Legal Opinion

Hume v. Mahan

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided September 3, 1932No. 7:09-misc-07002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREW M. J. COCHRAN, District Judge.

This is an action in equity for an injunction against the defendant, the regularly-elected, qualified, and acting secretary of state of the commonwealth of Kentucky, to restrain her from certifying to the county court clerks of the counties comprising the nine congressional districts laid off by the provisions of chapter 145 of the 1932 Act of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, under the congressional reapportionment following the fifteenth decennial census, the names of candidates for the nomination of their respective parties for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Ex Parte YarbroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Nixon v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Dyer v. Kazuhisa AbeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1956
  3. Brown v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  4. Burchell v. State Board of Election CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Preisler v. Secretary of State of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API