Legal Opinion

Medberry v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Walworth «county: FraNK M. Fish, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 9, 1900:

Cassoday, O. J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint for personal injury, alleging, in effect, that the plaintiff at the time of the injury, and for twenty-five years prior thereto, had been in the employment of the defendant as a conductor in charge of a train running-bet ween Elkhorn and the village of Eagle; that such train was known as a combination mixed or passenger train, consisting of freight and passenger cars, engine, etc.; that during all of the time of the plaintiff’s employment as such conductor it was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brabbits v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Akeson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Anderson v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Cooper v. Milwaukee & Prairie du Chien Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Ean v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hardt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Gaffney v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API