Medberry v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Walworth «county: FraNK M. Fish, Circuit Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 9, 1900:
Cassoday, O. J.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint for personal injury, alleging, in effect, that the plaintiff at the time of the injury, and for twenty-five years prior thereto, had been in the employment of the defendant as a conductor in charge of a train running-bet ween Elkhorn and the village of Eagle; that such train was known as a combination mixed or passenger train, consisting of freight and passenger cars, engine, etc.; that during all of the time of the plaintiff’s employment as such conductor it was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brabbits v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Akeson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Anderson v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Cooper v. Milwaukee & Prairie du Chien Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Ean v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Hardt v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Gaffney v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1906