Legal Opinion
Patel v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 26, 1993No. C92-20161 EAI, C92-20624 EAIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS RE INVERSE CONDEMNATION
INFANTE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The City brought its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., on the grounds that Plaintiff Hira Patel’s claim for inverse condemnation fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Clifford Greenberg appeared on behalf of the City. Thomas Boehm appeared on behalf of Patel.
Having considered the parties’ pleadings, the comments of counsel, and good cause appearing, the City’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- General Conference Corporation of Seventh-Day Adventists v. Seventh-Day Adventist Congregational Church John R. MarikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Customer Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kelley v. Story County SheriffSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Customer Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Customer Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kelley v. Story County SheriffSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000