Legal Opinion

Adams v. Byerly

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1890No. 14,169PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

Action by the appellee, Catharine Byerly, against Jeremiah Adams to recover damages for breach of marriage contract. The only question for decision is whether or not the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, or to support a judgment after verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The material averments of the complaint are, that on the 1st day of October, 1885, in consideration that the plaintiff, being unmarried, at the request of the defendant promised to marry him, the defendant promised to marry the plaintiff on or about the 30th day of April, 1886, and that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burtis v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Haymond v. SaucerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Holloway v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Southard v. RexfordNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  5. King v. KerseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1850

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. Supreme CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Indiana Life Endowment Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lettellier v. Abilene Flour Mills Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Walters v. StockbergerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Saxon v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API