Legal Opinion
Nettles v. Falck Northern California Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 6, 2024No. 3:24-cv-01640Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SIMONE NETTLES, 10 Case No. 24-cv-01640-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 REMAND FALCK NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 13 CORP., 14 Defendant. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 In this putative wage and hour class action, Plaintiff Simone Nettles asserts Defendant 17 Falck Northern California Corporation (“Falck”), a provider of emergency medical services to 18 Alameda County, violated various provisions of California state law. Nettles originally filed this 19 case in Alameda County Superior Court. Falck removed to federal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Provincial Gov't of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.