Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A.M.R.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 2017No. 08-16-00083-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*121OPINION

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

In this appeal, the issue is whether the trial court could issue a judgment nunc pro tunc and, if so, whether the trial coui’t corrected a clerical or judicial error. The trial court granted a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc which removed the language that lifted the geographical restriction of the child if the non-custodial parent resides outside El Paso County, Texas. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Juan Rivas and Ashley S. Buntyn were appointed joint managing conservators of their child, A.M.R. Appellant, Buntyn, was designated as the conservator with the exclusive…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Escobar v. EscobarTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Dikeman v. SnellTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  4. S & a RESTAURANT CORP. v. LealTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Andrews v. KochTexas Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. George Nolan Hines v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2024
  2. in Re X.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API