Legal Opinion

Gorham v. Denha

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1977No. Docket 28399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. J. Kaufman, J.

Plaintiff appeals, by leave granted, the trial court’s denial of a motion for summary judgment adjudging defendants to be in default under the terms of a promissory note and security agreement, and permitting plaintiff to exercise the remedy of acceleration and repossession as provided therein.

On September 3, 1974, defendants Denha and Shaya entered into a purchase agreement with plaintiffs predecessor in interest, Diamond Dot Market, Inc., for purchase of a retail grocery store in the City of Howell. The sale was completed on November 25, 1974, when the parties executed a bill of sale,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dumas v. HelmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Larson v. PittmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Cooper v. Jefferson Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Russell v. GlantzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. State Bank of Burleigh County Trust Co. v. All-American Sub, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Papo v. Aglo Restaurants of San Jose, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Hogg v. Farmers Home Administration (In Re Hogg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1987
  5. Frantz v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API