Legal Opinion

Malloy v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided March 2, 2007No. A-9011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to revisit an issue that was decided by the Alaska Supreme Court in State v. Malloy, 46 P.3d 949 (Alaska 2002) (an earlier stage of this same case). Under AS 12.55.125(a)(8), a defendant convicted of first-degree murder faces a mandatory minimum 99-year term of imprisonment, with no possibility of discretionary parole, if the sentencing judge finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant subjected the victim to substantial physical torture. The question is whether this statute violates a criminal defendant's right to trial by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
  2. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  3. Heavyrunner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API