Patrick v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
The legal question in this case is whether the results of a portable breath test, or what is sometimes called a roadside sobriety test, which are not admissible to prove a person is guilty of driving while intoxicated, are admissible when they would indicate a person is not guilty. In this case the answer is yes because the evidence is exculpatory, was crucial to the defense, and sufficiently reliable to warrant admission.
Roderick Patrick, a resident of Louisiana and a student at Louisiana State University, was in Arkansas working on a family farm near Arkadelphia. It…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. DorseyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Carl Pettijohn v. Frank HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Calnan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Massengale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Elser v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Bobby Kellensworth v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.