Legal Opinion

Patrick v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 16, 1988No. CR 87-223PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The legal question in this case is whether the results of a portable breath test, or what is sometimes called a roadside sobriety test, which are not admissible to prove a person is guilty of driving while intoxicated, are admissible when they would indicate a person is not guilty. In this case the answer is yes because the evidence is exculpatory, was crucial to the defense, and sufficiently reliable to warrant admission.

Roderick Patrick, a resident of Louisiana and a student at Louisiana State University, was in Arkansas working on a family farm near Arkadelphia. It…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. DorseyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Carl Pettijohn v. Frank HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Calnan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Massengale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Elser v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Bobby Kellensworth v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API