Legal Opinion

United States v. Beachem

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 21, 2005No. CR05-302MJPPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS 4 AND 6

PECHMAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts 4 and 6 (Dkt. No. 21). At issue before the Court is the correct interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A (“the statute”). Having considered Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiffs Response (Dkt. No. 23), and all other pertinent papers and documents associated with this motion, the Court finds that “knowingly,” as used in the statute, applies to “another person,” as used in 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) and requires a finding that the Defendant knew that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Jeffrey MeekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. MontejoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Villanueva-SoteloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Mendoza-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. GodinDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007
  4. United States v. Salazar-MonteroDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
  5. United States v. Contreras-MacedasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API