Legal Opinion

Amber Reineck House v. City of Howell

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 3, 2022No. 2:20-cv-10203Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION AMBER REINECK HOUSE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: 20-cv-10203 District Judge Paul D. Borman CITY OF HOWELL, et al., Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. Defendants. / ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (R&R) ON MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERTS (ECF NOS. 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 49) (ECF NO. 69) The Court has reviewed, de novo, the record, the Magistrate Judge's R&R, and the parties' objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R. (ECF Nos. 69, 70, 75, 76, 78.)1 Plaintiffs filed motions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. John Eric Thomas, and Wife, Heather Thomas v. City of Chattanooga, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API