Ricker v. Hopkins Chevrolet, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Webb, Judge.
In May of 1975 Ricker negotiated to purchase a 1975 Cosworth Vega from Hopkins, primarily because it was represented as being an out-of-the-ordinary limited edition, high performance automobile, and therefore a good investment, but also to use for transportation to drive to work. A pamphlet furnished by Hopkins stated in part as follows: "Not all Chevrolet dealers are Vega Cosworth dealers. So there are 48 Chevrolet mobile service vans dotted around the country, each commanded by a man who knows the inside of the Vega Cosworth. So you’ll have a 'pit crew’ in the area. . .
"Each…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hoard v. WileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Sisk v. CarneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Dickens v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Smith v. GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION OF GEORGIACourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Builders Transport, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- White v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Hill v. MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Jordan v. TrowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Cleaveland v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988