Chisum v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
On May 26 of this year we affirmed Chisum’s conviction for manslaughter. Chisum v. State, 273 Ark. 1, 616 S.W. 2d 728 (1981). His petition for rehearing was denied on June 29. On October 23 he filed the present petition seeking the permission of this court under Criminal Procedure Rule 37.2 (a) to file in the trial court a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The petition must be denied, for two fundamental reasons.
First, our present Rule 37 is essentially the same as our earlier rule governing postconviction relief. That rule, adopted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chisum v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Gross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Thacker v. UrbanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Woods v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Delaney v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Dumond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Utley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Lewellen v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- McDaniel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.