Kruger v. Western Fire & Marine Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. . The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This was an action to recover upon two' policies of insurance. The cause was tried before a jury, who brought in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, upon which a judgment was rendered against the defendant for fifteen hundred dollars, costs, etc.
From that judgment an appeal is prosecuted.
From that record it appears that in the year 1881 Grant Lapham, the agent of the defendant in the county of Alameda, where the plaintiffs kept their stock of goods, was at the place of business of the plaintiffs, and *92examined said stock, and that on the thirty-first day of August, 1881, after such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Van Schoick v. . Niagara Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Miner v. Phœnix InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Woodruff v. Imperial Fire Insurance Co. of London, EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weidert v. State Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Allen v. Home Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bedford v. Bedford's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Ames v. Employers Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.