Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Doe

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 22, 2015No. SJC-11861PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGants, C.J.

This case is the latest in a string of cases calling on us to decide the reach of G. L. c. 265, § 47, which provides in relevant part, “Any person who is placed on probation for any offense listed within the definition of ‘sex offense,’ ... as defined in [G. L. c. 6, § 178C,] shall, as a requirement of any term of probation, wear a global positioning system device ... at all times for the length of his probation for any such offense.” Most recently, in Commonwealth v. Hanson H., 464 Mass. 807, 808 (2013), we determined that the Legislature did not intend this statute to apply to juveniles who…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. RoucouletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. CoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burke v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liability Polices and BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. LaltaprasadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. KendrickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API