Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cory

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 18, 2009PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

General Laws c. 265, § 47, inserted by St. 2006, c. 308, § 8 (§ 47), requires any person who is “placed on probation” after conviction of a designated sex offense to wear a global positioning system (GPS) tracking device for the dura*560tion of his or her probation.1 In March, 2008, a judge in the Superior Court ruled that this statute applied to the defendant, and entered an order modifying the terms of the defendant’s probationary sentence to require that he wear a GPS device during his probation. The defendant appealed, and we granted his application for direct appellate review. We conclude…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Michael Belleau v. Edward WallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. George C. Riley v. New Jersey State Parole Board (069327)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API