Woolen Mills v. . Land Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Application for mandatory injunction. There was evidence tending to show the facts to be as follows: Plaintiff is the owner of 1 3/4 acres of land in the unincorporated town of Spray, on which its mill is situated. Its premises, except where the driveway connects with the public road, are surrounded by the lands of the water power and land company and allied corporations. Plaintiff was incorporated and began manufacturing woolen products upon its premises about 1881, and in 1893 acquired certain water rights and a title to its property by deed executed by the water power and land company. A…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wheelock v. . NoonanNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Hodgkins v. FarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Porter v. Mack Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hamlet Hospital v. Joint Committee on StandardizationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Clinard v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lloyd v. BabbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Hamlet Hospital v. Joint Committee on StandardizationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Clinard v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Automobile Dealer Resources, Inc. v. Occidental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.