Legal Opinion

Nash v. Conrad Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1983No. 8210IC776PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendants’ Appeal

We note at the outset that defendants’ contentions on appeal relate only to the award of additional compensation to the plaintiff for permanent partial disability to her knees.

Defendants’ several assignments of error present the single question of whether it was error to allow into evidence the opinion testimony of a medical expert and, on the basis of that testimony, award plaintiff additional compensation.

Defendants argue that the Industrial Commission should not have considered any evidence respecting any disability to plaintiff’s knees. Defendants contend…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Little v. Anson County Schools Food ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Tucker v. LowdermilkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Lynch v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Garmon v. Tridair Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoyle v. Carolina Associated MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Riggins v. Elkay Southern Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Sparks v. Sailors' Snug HarborCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Allison v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Hoyle v. Carolina Associated MillsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API