Legal Opinion
STEPNOSKY v. SILGAN HOLDINGS, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 2, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00319Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RICHARD STEPNOSKY, Case No. 21–cv–00319–KM–ESK Plaintiff, v. OPINION SILGAN HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants. MCNULTY, U.S.D.J. THIS MATTER is before the Court on plaintiff Richard Stepnosky’s motion to remand this case to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County (State Court). (“Motion”, DE 4.) The Motion also seeks an award of attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Defendants Silgan Holdings, Inc. (Silgan),1 Bryce Bedford, Mark Kwiatkowski, and Scott Garboski filed an opposition to the Motion. (DE 7.)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.