Legal Opinion

Rosenbaum v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 11, 1938No. 14,164PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knous

In the Denver police court and upon appeal therefrom in the county court of the City and County of Denver, the plaintiff in error, to whom we shall refer as the defendant, was found guilty of the violation of ordinance 52, series 1933 of the city of Denver, section 1 of which is as follows: “No person, firm or corporation, whether owner, proprietor, agent or employe, shall keep open, operate or assist in keeping open or operating any place or premises or residences; whether open or inclosed, for the purpose of selling, bartering or exchanging, or offering for sale, barter or exchange, any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. City of Denver v. BachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. State v. DolanIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Allen v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  5. McClelland v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Broadbent v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. McKaig v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Diamond Auto Sales, Inc. v. ErbeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API