Legal Opinion
Word v. Croce
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 27, 2001No. 00 CIV. 6496(SAS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging various violations of her civil rights. Specifically, plaintiff claims that her confinement to tuberculin hold (“TB hold”) at the Bed-ford Hills Correctional Facility (“Bedford Hills") and the denial of a “Therapeutic High Fiber Bland Non-Animal Non-Wheat Medical Diet” by that institution violates her constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment. 1 See Amended Complaint (“Cmplt”) ¶ 5. Plaintiff also claims that the policy of the New York State Department of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Torrence v. PelkeyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Word v. CroceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Atadzhanov v. The New York City Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Goode v. ClementDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Gu v. Police Officer Michael SherDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.