Legal Opinion

Walt v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 4, 1999No. 80, 1998PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

In this direct appeal, the defendant-appellant, James R. Walt, Sr ., (“Walt”) does not challenge the merits of his convictions for ten counts of Offensive Touching. 11 DeLC. § 601. Walt’s only contention is that, at the time of sentencing, the Superior Court should not have considered him to be a perpetrator of domestic violence. That designation subjected Walt to an enhanced sentence under the Truth-in-Sentencing Guidelines.

The State has raised a separate issue. The Delaware Constitution imposes limitations upon this Court’s appellate jurisdiction to hear direct appeals from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mayes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Shoemaker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. Marker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kurzmann v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  2. Leatherbury v. GreenspunSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  3. Priest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  4. Delmarva Health Plan, Inc. v. AcetoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
  5. Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API