Walt v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
In this direct appeal, the defendant-appellant, James R. Walt, Sr ., (“Walt”) does not challenge the merits of his convictions for ten counts of Offensive Touching. 11 DeLC. § 601. Walt’s only contention is that, at the time of sentencing, the Superior Court should not have considered him to be a perpetrator of domestic violence. That designation subjected Walt to an enhanced sentence under the Truth-in-Sentencing Guidelines.
The State has raised a separate issue. The Delaware Constitution imposes limitations upon this Court’s appellate jurisdiction to hear direct appeals from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mayes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Shoemaker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Marker v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kurzmann v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Leatherbury v. GreenspunSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Priest v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Delmarva Health Plan, Inc. v. AcetoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
- Weaver v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.