Legal Opinion
Kahn v. Massler
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 22, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 873-49PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MODARELLI, District Judge.
This action was removed to this court from the Superior Court of New Jersey. The plaintiffs, Irving Kahn and Peter Levathes, are citizens and residents of New York; there are two individual and two corporate defendants: Abraham Massler, James Wilson,1 Glassy Finish Process Co., and Bestway Products, Inc., New Jersey corporations.
In their amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that on and before December 19, 1946, Massler and Wilson were engaged in a technical capacity in the manufacture of phonograph records by conventional compression or lamination methods, or both.2…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Albert Ettore v. Philco Television Broadcasting Corporation, Clayton, Inc. & Chesebrough Manufacturing Company, ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Allred v. SasserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Forman v. LummAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John P. O'Brien v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Wittner v. MetzgerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Irving B. Kahn and Peter G. Levathes v. Abraham Massler, James Wilson, Glassy Finish Process Company, and Bestway Products, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Doughty v. First Pennsylvania Bank N. A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978