Neel v. Ramelli
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
This is a companion case to Neel v. Ramelli, No. 9327 (ante, p. 362 [32 Pac. (2d) 175]). The trial court found adversely to appellant as to certain parcels of the land in dispute and appellant has directed his appeal *367to the portions of the judgment covering such findings. Many issues are raised which are discussed at great length, appellant’s brief consisting of more than eight hundred pages. We will endeavor to limit these issues to such as we deem essential to a determination of the controversy.
Appellant urges that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that plaintiff acquired…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richert v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Taylor v. McConigleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Neel v. RamelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neel v. RamelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Flathead Lumber Corp. v. EverettMontana Supreme Court · 1953
- Flathead Lumber Corp. v. EverettMontana Supreme Court · 1953