Legal Opinion

Henderson v. American Hat Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 4, 1937No. 26344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, 0. J.

A motion to dismiss the writ of error was made on the grounds: (1) that the bill of exceptions was not tendered to the presiding judge within the time required by law, and (3) that no defendant in error is named in the bill of exceptions. The second ground of the motion was abandoned by counsel for the movant; and it suffices to say that, under the record, there is no merit in the third ground. It is undisputed that the judge signed the bill of exceptions on April 9, 1937, and that April 8, 1937, was the last day provided by law for the tender of the bill of exceptions to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Moore v. Kelly & Jones Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. LasseterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Sweat v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Ingalls v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spindel v. National Homes Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Shannon Co. v. HeneveldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Ponce De Leon Properties, Inc. v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API