Legal Opinion

United States v. Randall R. Neuhausser (99-3763) and Sheila Neuhausser (99-4144)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 14, 2001No. 99-3763, 99-4144PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant/Appellant Randall Neuhaus-ser appeals his sentence for conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). Defendant/Appellant Sheila Neuhausser appeals both her conviction and her sentence for this drug conspiracy offense, and also appeals her conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1952 for traveling in interstate commerce to further an unlawful activity, the distribution of cocaine. Following a trial that commenced on September 28, 1998, the jury returned guilty…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. Kayle NordbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Castillo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Soto-BeniquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Kelvin Mondale NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Brian Brown (01-2028) and Kevin Courtney (01-2162)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API