People v. Turner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. “Because a defendant pleading guilty to a determinate sentence must be aware of the postrelease supervision [PRS] component of that sentence in order to knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently choose among alternative courses of action, the failure of a court to advise of postrelease supervision requires reversal of the conviction” (People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 245 [2005]). Contrary to the conclusion of the majority, we agree with defendant that the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered and that she was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People v. CatuNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. LoureeNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. MurrayNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.