Legal Opinion
Winslow v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided May 20, 2004No. GDTC-D-02-157PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BACKGROUND
EAGAN, Judge.
The plaintiff brought the present action alleging three separate causes of action: The first is labeled “Age Discrimination” and cites 29 U.S.C. § 621 ADEA; the second is labeled “Violation of Right to Privacy” and cites 5 U.S.C. § 552(a): and the third is labeled “Retaliation” and cites 42 U.S.C. § 12203. In summary the plaintiff alleges that she was discriminated against by the defendant due to her age. The second count concerns an alleged unauthorized trip to the restroom and an allegation that the plaintiff was followed into the restroom by a supervisor. The third…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Antinerella v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hilda Garcia v. Akwesasne Housing Authority and John RansomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- LaVigne v. Mohegan Tribe of Indians of ConnecticutMohegan Trial Court · 2005
- Lovoi v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2005